Analysis of Nursing Effect of Children with Henoch-Schonlein Purpura Based on the PDCA Nursing Model.

By applying the PDCA model to the care of children with Henoch-Schonlein purpura, the nursing process can be divided into four stages: planning, execution, inspection, and treatment. According to the age characteristics and disease progression of pediatric patients, a complete nursing plan is formulated to efficiently implement the nursing content and improve the nursing effect. This paper studies the application of the PDCA nursing model in the nursing of children with Henoch-Schonlein purpura and statistically analyzes the disappearance of skin rash, joint pain relief, disappearance of urine protein, disappearance of gastrointestinal symptoms, etc. Finally, this paper combines the experiment to evaluate the intervention effect of this nursing model and provides reference for the follow-up care of children with Henoch-Schonlein purpura. From the results of experimental research, it can be known that PDCA nursing can improve the comfort of children with Henoch-Schonlein purpura, shorten the time for symptom disappearance, and speed up the recovery process.

Cohort Studies.

Editor's note: This is the seventh article in a series on clinical research by nurses. The series is designed to give nurses the knowledge and skills they need to participate in research, step by step. Each column will present the concepts that underpin evidence-based practice-from research design to data interpretation. The articles will be accompanied by a podcast offering more insight and context from the authors. To see all the articles in the series, go to http://links.lww.com/AJN/A204.

Who Advances Nursing Science in Practice Settings and How?

Nurse scientist (NS) roles in clinical practice settings are key components of The Future of Nursing and ANCC Magnet® recognition. Despite increased opportunities for NS roles, leveraging these roles to advance nursing science remains at an early stage. We describe opportunities and challenges for NSs in clinical practice settings, highlighting the value of a strong partnership with chief nurse officers as critical for the success of NSs and outcomes associated with these roles.

Evidence-Based Practice Culture and Mentorship Predict EBP Implementation, Nurse Job Satisfaction, and Intent to Stay: Support for the ARCC© Model.

BACKGROUND: The Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close Collaboration (ARCC© ) Model is a system-wide framework for implementing and sustaining evidence-based practice (EBP) in hospitals and healthcare systems. The model involves assessing organizational culture and readiness for EBP in addition to the development of a critical mass of EBP mentors who work with point-of-care clinicians to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based care. Determining how the various components of the ARCC© Model relate to one another is important for understanding how EBP culture and mentorship impact EBP implementation, nurses' job satisfaction, and intent to stay. AIMS: The current study aimed to test a model that could explain the relationships and direct pathways among eight key variables in the ARCC© Model: (1) EBP culture, (2) mentorship, (3) knowledge, (4) beliefs, (5) competency, (6) implementation, (7) nurses' job satisfaction, and (8) intent to stay. METHODS: Structural equation modeling was used to test relationships among the variables in the ARCC© Model with data obtained from an earlier cross-sectional descriptive study with 2,344 nurses from 19 hospitals and healthcare systems across the United States. RESULTS: The final structural equation model found that EBP culture and mentorship were key variables that positively impacted EBP knowledge, beliefs, competency, implementation, job satisfaction, and intent to stay among nurses. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: As described in the ARCC© Model, establishing a strong sustainable EBP culture along with a critical mass of EBP mentors is crucial for the development of EBP competency and consistent implementation of evidence-based care by nurses. A strong EBP culture along with EBP mentorship also can result in higher job satisfaction and intent to stay. Implementation of the ARCC© Model is a key strategy in assisting systems to reach health care's Quadruple Aim.

COVID-19 reveals the urgent need to strengthen nursing informatics competencies: a view from Peru.

The COVID-19 pandemic requires an urgent action to transform health-care delivery and to promote research and capacity-building nursing programs. Specifically, many countries at the global level have described nursing informatics as an essential competence for nurse professionals. In Peru, nursing personnel represents the largest health workforce group and nursing informatics is still emerging, but the field appear to hold much promise. In this sense, the Peruvian Ministry of Health (MoH) defined in 2020 the core nursing competences, which included a technology and innovation domain. The competence established to apply scientifically based technology and innovation to improve the processes or health service resources. The minimum competencies established by the MoH were as follows: to carry out innovations in processes or resources in their different professional performance areas, to creatively adapt technology in different areas of professional performance, to make rational and ethical use of health technologies with focus on new developments that will be evaluated and applied critically, and to manage information and communication technologies, and health information systems, with emphasis on telehealth (i.e. telemedicine, telecare management, tele-education, and tele-training). Besides the nursing competences defined by the MoH is a good starting point, this special contribution discusses the urgent need to strengthen nursing informatics competencies in Peru.

Measurement in Nursing Research.

Editor's note: This is the fourth article in a series on clinical research by nurses. The series is designed to give nurses the knowledge and skills they need to participate in research, step by step. Each column will present the concepts that underpin evidence-based practice-from research design to data interpretation. The articles will be accompanied by a podcast offering more insight and context from the authors. To see all the articles in the series, go to http://links.lww.com/AJN/A204.

Determining the level of evidence: Nonresearch evidence.

ABSTRACT: To support evidence-based nursing practice, the authors provide guidelines for nonresearch evidence, which includes clinical practice guidelines, consensus or position statements, literature review, expert opinion, organizational experience, case reports, community standards, clinician experience, and consumer preferences. This is the third in a three-part series.

Implementing a Mentorship Program for New Nurses During a Pandemic.

This article describes the implementation of an evidence-based mentoring program for new registered nurses (RNs) hired into medical-surgical units in a small community-based hospital during the unfolding of the SARS-Cov2 (COVID-19) pandemic. The hospital's nursing leadership supported the program implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide a broader support system to new RNs to improve nurse retention. During a response to the pandemic, the medical-surgical units faced numerous process changes in a short time, which further reinforced the urgency of an additional support system for the newly hired RNs.

Implementing Prone Positioning for COVID-19 Patients Outside the Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Proning intubated intensive care unit patients for the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome is an accepted standard of practice. We examined the nursing climate in 4 units and its impact on implementing a novel self-proning protocol to treat COVID-19 patients outside the intensive care unit. LOCAL PROBLEM: Nursing units previously designated for medical/surgical populations had to adjust quickly to provide evidence-based care for COVID-19 patients attempting self-proning. METHODS: Nurses from 4 nursing units were surveyed about the implementation process on the self-proning protocol. Their perception of unit implementation was assessed via the Implementation Climate Scale. INTERVENTIONS: A new self-proning nursing protocol was implemented outside the intensive care unit. RESULTS: Consistent education on the protocol, belief in the effectiveness of the intervention, and a strong unit-based climate of evidence-based practice contributed to greater implementation of the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a new nursing protocol is possible with strong unit-based support, even during a pandemic.

Forensic mental health nursing and evidence-based practice: a quantitative study.

Background: Little is known about the personal, professional and workplace factors that influence evidence-based practice for forensic mental health nurses. Aim: This study describes the sources of practice knowledge for forensic mental health nurses, and the factors that influence the implementation of evidence-based practice. Design: This research study utilised a cross sectional survey design. Methods: All nurses (n = 244) working in one forensic mental health in-patient facility were sent an electronic invitation to complete the Developing Evidence Based Practice Questionnaire. Data was analysed to calculate descriptive statistics. Findings: Fifty-three respondents completed the survey. Respondents reported using experiential knowledge and locally derived sources of information more frequently than research-based evidence to inform their practice. Respondents reported being least skilled at finding, reviewing and using research evidence to change practice. The most frequently rated barriers to evidence-based practice were having insufficient time and resources to both finding and reviewing information and to implement changes in practice. Conclusions: Forensic mental health nurses tend to express a bias towards valuing social or qualitative sources of information to inform practice. Exploring the relationships between individual and organisational factors in the context of forensic mental health is recommended in order to gain further insights into the translation of evidence into practice for forensic mental health nurses. Impact statement: Unique contextual aspects of the forensic mental health environment may influence the implementation of evidence-based practice. Our study highlights that further support, resources and training is required to promote the use of research-based evidence in forensic mental health nursing.

Integrating the "best" evidence into nursing of venous thromboembolism in ICU patients using the i-PARIHS framework.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how to integrate the "best" practice into nursing of venous thromboembolism (VTE) based on the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was used. A steering group for clinical evidence implementation (EI) was established to conduct pre-implementation baseline surveys, a thorough analysis of the evidence, and an analysis of the survey results. The hindering and enabling factors associated with the clinical implementation of the evidence were analysed based on the three core elements of i-PARIHS, to formulate the clinical implementation plan for VTE nursing evidence. On-site expert reviews and focus group interviews were used to evaluate the feasibility of the draft plan, make adjustments, and finalize the evidence-based practice plan, which was then put into practice and evaluated. RESULTS: A new nursing process, a health education manual and a nursing quality checklist on VTE has been established and proved to be appropriate through the implementation. Compliance with evidence related to VTE nursing increased significantly in the two units, with better compliance in unit B than unit A. The knowledge, attitude and behaviour scores for VTE nursing increased substantially in both nurses and patients. CONCLUSION: The EI programme of incorporating the "best" evidence on VTE nursing into clinical practice using the i-PARIHS framework demonstrated feasibility, appropriateness and effectiveness and could serve as a reference.

Empowering Nurses: Creation of a Peer-Reviewed Journal as a Catalyst for Innovative Nursing Research and Enhancing Evidence-Based Nursing Practice.

An internal peer-reviewed journal was created to promote high-quality nursing practice, improve patient outcomes, and inspire nurses at an academic medical center. The goal of the journal was to increase nurses' utilization of evidence-based practice (EBP). The publication provides a platform that facilitates the dissemination of nursing research and supports the implementation of EBP across the organization.

Apuntes de investigación en cuidados / Notes on healthcare research

En 1859, Florence Nightingale aseveró "For the sick it is important to have the best", la única forma de identificar lo mejor es investigando sobre los cuidados. La investigación es la herramienta válida que permite generar o consolidar el conocimiento disciplinar y profesional. En la actualidad los estudios liderados por Linda Aiken han demostrado, en el ámbito internacional y durante más de tres décadas, que los resultados de los pacientes no se explican en función de las características de los hospitales, sino por la calidad de los cuidados que se les dispensan. Este artículo tiene por objetivo reflexionar sobre la importancia de la investigación en cuidados, su relación con la práctica basada en la evidencia y los resultados en salud de los pacientes, además de revisar los apoyos a la investigación como son Investén del Instituto de Salud Carlos III, el Plan Estratégico de Investigación e Innovación en Salud (PERIS) y la European Academy of Nursing Science (EANS). Sin lugar a dudas la pandemia de la COVID-19 ha situado a las enfermeras en un punto de inflexión que solo, y según su respuesta para incrementar la visibilidad, será ascendente o descendente. La investigación constituye la pieza clave para dar respuesta al reto

In 1859, Florence Nightingale stated: "For the sick it is important to have the best"; and the only way to identify the best is through healthcare research, which is the valid tool that allows generating or strengthening disciplinary and professional knowledge. Current studies led by Linda Aiken have demonstrated in the international setting, and for over three decades, that patient outcomes cannot be explained through the hospital characteristics, but by the quality of care provided. This article aims to reflect on the importance of healthcare research, its association with evidence-based practice and health outcomes in patients; also to review support for research such as INVESTEN from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Strategic Plan for Research and Innovation in Health (PERIS), and the European Academy of Nursing Science (EANS). Undoubtedly, the COVID-19 pandemic has placed nurses at a tipping point that will only be ascending or descending based on their response to increase visibility. Research represents the key element to address this challenge

Identifying international barriers and facilitators to research utilization.

PURPOSE: To define research utilization (RU) and identify barriers and facilitators to RU in nursing practice. METHODS: An international integrative review of 42 studies was conducted related to barriers and facilitators of RU. RESULTS: Following a review of the research that met the inclusion criteria, the author identifies common themes related to the implementation of research into clinical practice and the challenges surrounding RU. CONCLUSION: Despite consistently perceived barriers to research among nurses from different geographic, cultural, and clinical backgrounds, practice changes are typically out of their hands. Further research is necessary to gauge perception among the nursing associations, regulatory bodies, healthcare organizations, policy makers, and managers responsible for implementing these changes.

Aligning Organizational Culture and Infrastructure to Support Evidence-Based Practice.

Standardized nursing practice based on the foundations of evidence-based practice leads to high-quality patient care and optimal outcomes. Despite knowing the benefits of evidence-based practice, health care organizations do not consistently make it the standard of care; thus, implementation of evidence-based practice at the system level continues to be challenging. This article describes the process adopted by a facility in the Southwest that took on the challenge of changing the organizational culture to incorporate evidence-based practice. The organization met the challenges by identifying perceived and actual barriers to successful implementation of evidence-based practice. The lack of standardized practice was addressed by developing a group of stakeholders including organizational leaders, clinical experts, and bedside providers. Changing the culture required a comprehensive process of document selection and development, education, and outcome evaluation. The ultimate aim was to implement an integrated system to develop practices and documents based on the best evidence to support patient outcomes.